Blog

GST & Compliance

57th GST Council Meeting on 12 September 2026: Expected Reforms on ITC, Refunds and Registration

By CA Neeraj Rohilla, FCA · Startup Advisory, Saket, New Delhi · Updated 4 September 2026

57th GST Council meeting on 12 September 2026 in New Delhi - reported agenda covering blocked ITC under Section 17(5), inverted duty refunds, registration simplification, automated cancellation, multi-state ITC transfer, state revenue review and GSTAT
In a nutshell: The 57th GST Council meets in New Delhi on 12 September 2026, chaired by the Union Finance Minister, with the officers' meeting on 11 September. It is the first Council meeting in roughly a year — the 56th met on 3 September 2025 and delivered the GST 2.0 rate restructuring. On press reports, this one is procedural, not rate-led: blocked input tax credit under Section 17(5) including construction and works contracts, protection for buyers when a supplier defaults, inverted duty refunds, seamless ITC transfer across states, registration simplification for larger businesses, automated cancellation, a GSTAT stock-take, and a review of Centre and state revenue after the rate cuts. If even half of the ITC agenda lands, it is a bigger working-capital event for most businesses than last year's rate cuts were.
How to read this article — and every other pre-Council article you will see this week. The GST Council does not publish its agenda in advance. Everything below is drawn from press reporting and from officials speaking without attribution. Nothing becomes a recommendation until the press release issued on the evening of 12 September, and nothing becomes law until CBIC notifies it — or, where the CGST Act itself must change, until Parliament amends it. We have marked each item below with what it actually is. We will rewrite this page with the decisions after the meeting; if you are reading it after 12 September and it still says "expected", the update has not landed yet, so go to the official press release.

The meeting: date, context and why this one matters

DetailPosition
Meeting57th meeting of the GST Council
Date12 September 2026, from 11 AM
Officers' meeting11 September 2026
VenueNew Delhi
ChairUnion Finance Minister, with state finance ministers as members
Previous meeting56th, on 3 September 2025 — approved GST 2.0; notifications 17 September 2025; effective 22 September 2025
GapRoughly one year — unusually long by the Council's own standards

The year-long gap is the most useful fact in that table. The Council spent 2025 doing something structural — collapsing four slabs into 5% and 18% with a 40% demerit rate, exempting individual life and health insurance, and moving small cars, air conditioners and televisions down from 28% to 18%. It then stayed away for twelve months while that settled. A Council that reconvenes after a year of silence is not reconvening to fine-tune rates. It is reconvening because the plumbing — credit, refunds, registration — has become the binding constraint.

What is reported to be on the agenda

ItemWhat it would meanStatus
Blocked ITC under Section 17(5)Easing the bar on credit for motor vehicles, food and beverages, beauty and health services, club memberships, travel benefitsReported
Construction & works contract creditRationalising blocked credit post-Safari Retreats and the Finance Act 2025 retrospective amendmentReported
Supplier default protectionLegal and system changes so a genuine buyer does not lose credit because the seller did not payReported
Inverted duty refundsFaster, wider refund of credit accumulated where inputs are taxed higher than outputsReported
Multi-state ITC transferAllowing credit to move between a taxpayer's own GSTINs across statesReported
Registration simplificationExtending fast, risk-based registration beyond the Rule 14A small-taxpayer scheme to larger businessesWidely reported as the lead item
Automated cancellation / surrenderSystem-driven closure of registration without the current officer-dependent processReported
GSTAT stock-takeReview of how the Appellate Tribunal is functioning since it became operationalReported
Centre and state revenue reviewAssessment of the fiscal position a year after the GST 2.0 rate cutsReported
Fresh rate rationalisationIndustry asking; unclear whether the Council takes it upDemand, not agenda

1. Blocked credit under Section 17(5) — the biggest number on the table

Section 17(5) is the provision that denies input tax credit regardless of whether the expense is genuinely for business. Motor vehicles for passenger transport, food and beverages, outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, club and fitness memberships, travel benefits to employees, and — the expensive one — goods and services used in the construction of immovable property.

For a services business in Delhi NCR, the everyday cost of Section 17(5) is unglamorous but real: GST on the office cafeteria contract, on the company car, on the team offsite, on employee health cover. None of it is creditable. It sits in the P&L as a straight 5–18% uplift on those costs. For a company building a factory, a warehouse or a mall, the number is not an uplift on a cost line — it is a capital sum, often in crores.

The construction problem, and why a Council recommendation may not be enough

The construction limb has already been through the courts. In Safari Retreats, the Supreme Court read Section 17(5)(d) purposively and applied a functionality test — if a building is itself the apparatus by which the taxpayer supplies its output service, such as a mall let out on rent, it can qualify as "plant" and the credit bar need not apply. The review petition against that judgment was dismissed in May 2025.

The relief was then removed legislatively. The Finance Act, 2025 substituted the words "plant and machinery" for "plant or machinery" in Section 17(5)(d), with retrospective effect from 1 July 2017, which restores the wider bar and displaces the reading the Supreme Court had given.

This is why "Council may rationalise blocked credits on construction" needs reading carefully. The bar now sits in the statute, in words Parliament chose deliberately and retrospectively. The Council can recommend a change; only a Finance Bill can make it.

Practical translation: if relief on the everyday Section 17(5) items comes through a notification or a circular, it could move quickly. If it touches the construction limb, expect the Council to signal intent on 12 September and the actual amendment to arrive with the next Finance Bill. Plan cash flows on the second timeline, not the first.

2. Section 16(2)(c) — being punished for your supplier's default

This is the provision that generates more GST litigation than any other, and it is the one item on the reported agenda that would change daily life for a small business immediately.

Section 16(2)(c) makes a buyer's credit conditional on the supplier having actually paid the tax to the government. The buyer has paid the invoice, holds a tax invoice, has received the goods, and has no ability whatsoever to verify whether the seller deposited the money. Where the seller did not, the department recovers from the buyer — who is the only solvent party left. Every practitioner in Delhi has a file where a client is being asked to reverse credit on a vendor who has since disappeared.

Reports suggest the Council may look at legal and technology changes to protect bona fide recipients. What that could look like: a statutory safe harbour where the buyer has paid through banking channels and the invoice appears in GSTR-2B; a recovery sequence that requires the department to proceed against the supplier first; or system-level flagging that warns a buyer before the credit is claimed rather than three years later.

Until something is notified, nothing has changed. If you are holding a notice on supplier default, do not wait for 12 September before replying — limitation periods for replies and appeals do not pause for Council meetings. Read our note on the Supreme Court's ruling on Section 74 show cause notices, which is often the better ground of defence in these matters.

3. Refunds — the working-capital story GST 2.0 created

The rate restructuring of September 2025 had an arithmetic side effect that got very little attention at the time. When output rates fall to 5% but input rates stay at 18%, credit accumulates and cannot be used. That is the inverted duty structure, and the 2025 rate cuts widened it for a whole set of manufacturers who had not previously been in that position.

Two related items are reported to be on the table: refund of accumulated credit under inverted duty structures, and refund of unutilised credit on inter-state transfers.

Some of the machinery already exists. From 1 November 2025, provisional refunds of 90% are sanctioned on a system-run risk analysis, and the department's refund throughput has visibly improved — refunds in August 2026 were up 67.9% year on year. What the Council is reported to be considering is widening the categories that can claim at all, rather than speeding up categories that already can.

Do not wait for the Council on this one. The limitation for a refund application under Section 54 is two years from the relevant date, and it runs whatever the Council decides. Every quarter you defer a filing in the hope of a better scheme is a quarter of the oldest claim ageing towards being time-barred. File now under the existing rules; if the rules improve, the improvement applies to what follows.

4. Registration simplification — the item most reports lead with

The current position: Rule 14A, introduced by Notification No. 18/2025 – Central Tax dated 31 October 2025 with effect from 1 November 2025, offers an optional simplified registration with automated approval in three working days. It is deliberately narrow.

Rule 14A schemePosition today
EligibilityMonthly output tax liability (CGST + SGST/UTGST + IGST + cess) not exceeding ₹2.5 lakh
ApprovalElectronic, within three working days, subject to system risk assessment
AadhaarMandatory authentication of the primary authorised signatory and at least one promoter/partner
Exiting the schemeFORM GST REG-32 to withdraw; officer issues REG-33; the same GSTIN converts to normal — no fresh registration
ExcludedPersons under Section 25(6D), those already holding a Rule 14A registration in the same State/UT, failed Aadhaar or PAN verification, pending cancellation proceedings

The gap is obvious. A business with more than ₹2.5 lakh of monthly output tax — which is a business doing roughly ₹1.4 crore a month at 18% — goes back into the ordinary queue, with physical verification and officer discretion. Every practitioner has watched a straightforward application for a well-documented company take three to six weeks while a proprietor's application clears in three days. That inversion is what the reported agenda item is aimed at.

Alongside it, automated cancellation and surrender. Today, closing a GSTIN is harder than opening one: final returns, officer satisfaction, and files that sit for months. A system-driven closure would matter to anyone winding up a branch, exiting a state, or cleaning up dormant registrations before a transaction. If you are registering afresh in the meantime, our GST registration and South Delhi registration guide set out what the process looks like as it stands today.

5. Multi-state ITC transfer

A company with GSTINs in six states can be sitting on unusable credit in two of them and paying cash in the other four. The credit is the same taxpayer's money, held under the same PAN, and there is currently no route to move it. Reported deliberations on "seamless transfer of ITC across states for multi-state taxpayers" would address exactly this.

If it happens, it is a material and immediate cash release for anyone operating across state lines — retail chains, logistics operators, service companies with state-wise registrations, e-commerce sellers holding registrations for warehouse states. It is also, technically, one of the harder things on the list, because IGST settlement between states depends on credit staying where it arose. Treat it as the item with the highest value and the lowest probability of arriving fully formed.

6. The revenue question sitting behind everything

The Council can only give away what it can afford. So the revenue review is not a separate agenda item — it is the constraint on all the others.

IndicatorPosition
Gross GST collections, August 2026₹1,99,853 crore, up 14.8% year on year
Refunds, August 2026Up 67.9% year on year
FY26 GST collection growth5.6%, against 9.4% in FY25 (SBI Research)
Q1 FY27 collection growth1.5% headline; 8.4% excluding the compensation cess effect (SBI Research)
Compensation cessEnded; states' share of demerit-goods revenue rose from about ₹19.74 to about ₹28.20 per ₹100 of intra-state supply (SBI Research)
SBI Research estimateStates gain roughly ₹1.43 lakh crore in FY27; combined state share of GST and basic excise rising to about ₹19.1 lakh crore from ₹17.7 lakh crore

Read that table as the answer to "will rates go back up". A month printing close to ₹2 lakh crore at 14.8% growth, twelve months after the biggest rate cut in GST's history, is the government's own vindication of GST 2.0. Nobody reopens that. What a comfortable revenue position does buy is the room to concede procedural relief — credits, refunds, registration — which costs the exchequer far less than a rate change and buys far more goodwill.

The genuine tension is between the Centre and the states rather than between government and taxpayers. States lost the cess cushion, and a state finance minister asked to approve wider ITC relief is being asked to approve a permanent reduction in their own collections. That is why the reported agenda is heavy on process and light on anything that permanently narrows the base.

What we are telling clients to do before 12 September

  1. Build the Section 17(5) schedule now. Year-wise, head-wise: what credit you have written off on vehicles, canteen, staff welfare, travel, insurance, construction. If relief comes, the businesses that claim it are the ones that can quantify it in a week, not the ones that start reconstructing ledgers in November.
  2. Check Section 16(4) before you get excited. Relief announced in September 2026 does not automatically resurrect credit that has already become time-barred. Any older credit needs a view on whether it can still be taken at all — and that view should be formed now, not after an announcement creates a rush.
  3. File the refund claims you have been sitting on. Two-year limitation under Section 54, running today. Inverted duty and zero-rated claims especially. Our note on the Annexure-B JSON for GST refunds covers the filing mechanics that trip most applications up.
  4. Do not defer a registration. If you are eligible under Rule 14A you already have three-working-day approval. Waiting for a scheme that may not be notified until November is a self-inflicted delay.
  5. Do not act on the press release. The evening of 12 September will produce headlines that read like law. They are recommendations. The notification is the law, and on the 56th Council's timetable it came fourteen days later.
The one prediction we will make. The reported agenda is entirely about credit, refunds and registration — the parts of GST that consume working capital and management time rather than the parts that set price. If it lands even partially, the winners will be businesses whose records are clean enough to claim quickly, and the losers will be businesses that hear the news, agree it is good, and do nothing for six weeks. That gap is not created on 12 September. It is created in the fortnight before it.

How Startup Advisory helps

From our Saket office we run GST advisory and litigation support for exporters, e-commerce sellers, manufacturers and service companies across Delhi NCR: Section 17(5) credit reviews and blocked-credit schedules, inverted duty and zero-rated refund filings, replies to supplier-default and ITC-mismatch notices, registration and multi-state GSTIN structuring, and monthly compliance under retainer. We will publish the decisions from the 57th Council on this page once the press release is out, and follow it with the notification analysis rather than the headline version.

See our GST advisory and GST registration services, and our Virtual CFO retainer where the credit and refund position needs monitoring month on month. Related reading: the Supreme Court on Section 74 notices, RCM on import of services, e-way bill changes in 2026 and the GST and TDS compliance calendar.

If you want your blocked-credit and refund position mapped before the Council meets, call 9311972982.

This article is general information and informed expectation, not legal or professional advice, and it is written before the meeting. The GST Council does not publish its agenda in advance; the items described as "reported" are drawn from press coverage of 29–30 August 2026 and from officials speaking without attribution, and may not be taken up, may be modified, or may be decided differently. Statements of existing law — Rule 14A and Notification No. 18/2025 – Central Tax dated 31 October 2025, the 56th Council decisions of 3 September 2025 notified on 17 September 2025 and effective 22 September 2025, the Finance Act 2025 amendment to Section 17(5)(d), and the collection figures cited — are as at 4 September 2026. Verify against the official press release, CBIC notifications and cbic.gov.in before acting on anything here.

Frequently Asked Questions

Saturday, 12 September 2026, in New Delhi, from 11 AM, chaired by the Union Finance Minister, with the officers' meeting on 11 September 2026. It is the first Council meeting in roughly a year — the 56th met on 3 September 2025 and approved the GST 2.0 rate restructuring.

On press reports rather than a published agenda: relief on blocked ITC under Section 17(5) including construction and works contracts; protection for bona fide recipients where the supplier defaults; refunds of accumulated credit under inverted duty structures and on inter-state transfers; seamless ITC transfer across states for multi-state taxpayers; registration simplification for larger businesses; automated cancellation and surrender of registration; a GSTAT stock-take; and a review of Centre and state revenue after the GST 2.0 rate cuts. The Council does not publish its agenda in advance — none of it is confirmed until the post-meeting press release.

A broad rate revision looks unlikely. The 5% / 18% structure with 40% on demerit goods took effect on 22 September 2025 and is barely a year old, and August 2026 collections of about ₹1.99 lakh crore (up 14.8%) give the Council no revenue reason to reopen it. Some industry segments have asked for reconsideration on specific items; whether the Council takes those up is unclear. Plan on the current rate structure continuing.

Reports point to easing the bar on credit for motor vehicles, food and beverages, beauty treatment and health services, club and fitness memberships and travel benefits, and separately on construction and works contracts. The construction limb follows the Supreme Court's Safari Retreats functionality test under Section 17(5)(d), which the Finance Act, 2025 neutralised by retrospectively substituting "plant and machinery" for "plant or machinery" with effect from 1 July 2017. Relief there needs a statutory amendment, not just a Council recommendation.

It is reported to be under discussion. Section 16(2)(c) makes a buyer's credit conditional on the supplier actually paying tax, which the buyer cannot verify or enforce — it is one of the largest sources of GST litigation. Reports suggest legal and technology changes to protect genuine recipients. Until an amendment is notified the existing position stands, including departmental recovery from the recipient, so do not pause a pending reply or appeal on the strength of the meeting.

Rule 14A (Notification No. 18/2025 – Central Tax dated 31 October 2025, effective 1 November 2025) gives automated approval in three working days, but only where monthly output tax liability does not exceed ₹2.5 lakh, with Aadhaar authentication of the primary authorised signatory and at least one promoter or partner. The reported agenda item is extending a comparable risk-based, time-bound route to larger low-risk businesses, plus an automated route for cancellation and surrender.

Not on 12 September. The Council recommends; CBIC notifications make it law, and where the CGST Act itself changes, Parliament and the state legislatures must amend it. On the 56th Council's timetable — meeting 3 September 2025, notifications 17 September 2025, effective 22 September 2025 — roughly three weeks for measures needing only notifications. Anything requiring a statutory amendment, such as reopening Section 17(5), realistically waits for the next Finance Bill.

Better than the rate cuts implied. Gross collections in August 2026 were about ₹1,99,853 crore, up 14.8% year on year, with refunds up 67.9%. SBI Research has noted FY26 growth slowed to 5.6% from 9.4% in FY25, and that Q1 FY27 rose 1.5% headline but 8.4% excluding the compensation cess effect. On those numbers the Council has room for procedural relief and little reason to reverse rate cuts.

Four things. Prepare a year-wise schedule of credit written off under Section 17(5), so relief can be quantified immediately. Check the Section 16(4) time limit on older credit — relief in September 2026 will not necessarily resurrect time-barred credit. File pending inverted duty and zero-rated refund claims now, because the two-year limitation under Section 54 runs regardless of the Council. And do not defer a registration application — Rule 14A already delivers three-working-day approval for eligible applicants.

No. The Council notifies date and venue; the detailed agenda circulates to members and officers but is not published. Everything reported beforehand comes from officials speaking off the record, from state finance departments, or from Group of Ministers' reports already public. Treat pre-meeting coverage — including this article — as informed expectation, and act only on the official press release after the meeting and the notifications that follow.
NR

About the author: CA Neeraj Rohilla, FCA

Co-Founder & Chartered Accountant, Startup Advisory — Saket, New Delhi

CA Neeraj Rohilla is a Fellow Chartered Accountant (FCA) and a co-founder of Startup Advisory. He leads the firm's work on company registration, Startup India (DPIIT) recognition, income-tax advisory and virtual CFO services for founders across Delhi NCR.

Our Testimonials

Our Clients

Latest Updates

Fresh guides on tax, GST and startup compliance from our CA team.

Get a Free Consultation

Share your details — our experts call you back.